University of California, Berkeley


Physics Physics 8A: Introductory Physics
Section 1, Fall 2007
Instructor: Yury Kolomensky

Problem of the Week

Some students complain that the exam problems are unlike (more difficult than) the homework problems. Partially, this is true, and is inevitable: the web assignments are very interactive, and serve as a learning, as well as the assessment tool. The exams are, primarily, an assessment tool, in which I am trying to determine how much you really understand the material. Some of the end-of-chapter problems are closer in spirit to the exams. Nevertheless, it may be useful for you to have access to ``exam-like'' problems throughout the semester, so that you can try them while the material is still fresh in your mind. Throughout the semester, I will maintain this ''Problem of the Week'' page. Here, most of the problems will deal with ``real-world'' situations, that you should be able to analyze. The focus, like in the exams, will be on physics concepts, though to be successful, you also need to be able to translate the conceptual understanding into the full numeric solution. I will post the problems here approximately once a week, after we complete an appropriate section of the course. I will post solutions a week later. Each problem is given an approximate point value, to set the scale of what it might be worth on the exam. These points do not count toward your grade, you are free to do these problems on your own, or ignore them. Of course, you are also welcome to discuss them with me or the GSIs.
  1. Week 1: Units
  2. Week 2: Motion in 1 dimension
  3. Week 3: Projectile Motion
  4. Week 4: Forces
  5. Week 5: Work
  6. Weeks 6-7: Momentum and Kinetic Energy
  7. Week 8: Circular Motion
  8. Week 9: Rotation of Rigid Bodies
  9. Practice problems for MT2 supplement the problems for this week. In particular, check out problems on the rigid body equilibrium (#2b), angular momentum conservation (#3), buoyancy (#4) and Bernoulli's law (#5).
  10. Oscillations

  1. Importance of Units: The Gimli Glider: HRW 5-69 (20 points)

    Throughout this course, we will expect you to be careful with units in your calculations. Yet some students tend to neglect them and just trust that they always work out properly. Maybe this real-world example will keep you from such a sloppy habit. The incident is known in aviation as the Gimli Glider

    On July 23, 1983, Air Canada Flight 143 was being readied for its long trip from Montreal to Edmonton. The fuel gauges on board were not operational, and the flight crew asked the ground crew to determine how much fuel was already on board. The flight crew knew they needed to begin the trip with 22,300 kg of fuel. They knew that amount in kilograms because Canada had recently switched to the metric system; previously fuel had been measured in pounds. The ground crew could measure the onboard fuel only in liters, which they reported as 7,682 L. Thus, to determine how much fuel was on board and how much additional fuel was needed, the flight crew asked the ground crew for the conversion factor from liters to kilograms of fuel. The response was 1.77, which the flight crew used (assuming that 1.77 kg corresponds to 1 L).

    (a) How many kilograms of fuel did the flight crew think they had? (In this problem, take all given data as being exact.)
    (b) How many liters did they ask to be added?

    Unfortunately, the response from the ground crew was based on pre-metric habits: 1.77 was the conversion factor not from liters to kilograms but rather from liters to pounds of fuel (1.77 lb corresponds to 1 L).

    (c) How many kilograms of fuel were actually on board, before the ground crew added some? (Except for the given 1.77, use four significant figures for other conversion factors.)
    (d) How many liters of additional fuel were actually needed?
    (e) When the airplane left Montreal, what percentage of the required fuel did it have?

    On route to Edmonton, at an altitude of 41,000 feet, the Boeing 767 airplane ran out of fuel and became a $40M glider. Although the airplane had no power, the pilot managed to glide it toward an old airforce base in Gimli, Manitoba.

    Under the circumstances, the glide and the landing were impeccable. Unfortunately, the runway at that airport had been converted to a track for race cars, and a steel barrier had been constructed across it. Fortunately, as the airplane hit the runway, the front landing gear collapsed, dropping the nose of the airplane onto the runway. The skidding slowed the airplane so that it stopped just short of the steel barrier, with stunned race drivers and fans looking on. All on board the airplane emerged safely. The point here is this: Take care of the units.





  2. Champagne from United 97 (30 points)

    This is another real life story; one in which yours truly was able to gain an (unfair) advantage from his physics problem-solving skills.

    United Airlines runs a little contest on every flight from the US mainland to Hawaii. The passengers are asked to determine the time the plane will reach the exact geographical midpoint of the journey (e.g. the point exactly half distance between SFO and HNL airports). The person who gets the closest answer wins a bottle of good French champagne (typically reserved for those in First Class  ). I won the bottle on my recent (and the only) trip to Honolulu; I was off by 7 seconds (I do not mean to brag; as you may guess from the calculation below, there is an uncertainty of a few minutes in the answer, and hence some luck is involved). But let's see if you can reproduce the calculation.

    Shortly after takeoff, the flight attendant announced the game, and gave the relevant (and some irrelevant) data:

    • Total estimated flight time: 5 hrs 15 mins
    • Departure (wheels up) time: 6:28pm PDT
    • Flight distance SFO-HNL: 2128 nautical miles
    • Cruising airspeed: 466 knots (nautical miles per hour). This is the speed of the plane relative to the air.
    • Estimated headwind: 33 knots for the first half of the journey, 40 knots for the second half.
    We will split the calculation in a few parts:

    (a) What is the ground speed of the airplane for the first and second parts of the flight ? That is, how fast is the airplane moving relative to the ground (or rather, ocean) ?
    (b) If you assume that the airplane travels the entire distance with the airspeed of 466 knots under the headwind conditions above, how long would it take to fly between SFO and HNL ? Compare this time to the flight time declared above: this tells you how good the assumption is (and roughly how long it takes for takeoff and descent).
    (c) Luckily for me, I noticed that we took off almost directly westward, and spent about 13 minutes to reach the cruising speed. What was the average acceleration and average ground speed during that time ?
    (d) Taking results from (c) into account and assuming that the ground speed was constant after the first 13 minutes, how long did it take to reach the midpoint of the journey ?

    Good luck !




  3. Kickoff at the Oakland Coliseum (30 points)
    Sebastian Janikowski is kicking off for the Oakland Raiders. His powerful left leg launches the ball from the 30-yard line with the initial velocity of 30 m/s. Assuming no air resistance, can the ball reach the end of the field, i.e. travel at least 80 yards (73 m), resulting in touch-back ? Explain your answer (i.e a simple yes or no answer is not sufficient). Assuming Mr. Janikowski has picked an optimal angle for the kick (he did graduate from college, after all), how long is the ball in the air ? What is the highest elevation of the trajectory ?

    Solutions to Problems 1-3






  4. Miracle above the Vatican (30 points)
    In the climax of the novel Angels and Demons by Dan Brown, the hero, Robert Langdon, escapes the anti-matter bomb explosion by jumping from a helicopter at about 10,000 feet with a makeshift parachute. He is saved by a 2x4 sq. yard (approximately 8 m2) canopy, which he holds with his bare hands. The canopy provides enough drag force so that Robert could survive the fall into the Tiber river, recover, and bring the bad guy to justice. I am not spoiling it for you too much, am I   ? Here, we will analyze whether this miraculous escape is plausible (never mind the radiation from the bomb).

    (a) If Robert's mass is 80 kg, the drag coefficient for the canopy is C=1 and the air density is 1.2 kg/m3, estimate Robert's terminal speed.
    (b) Robert was an avid swimmer and diver, which helped him survive the high-speed dip into Tiber. Ignoring air resistance, what elevation would a human need to jump from to hit the water with the same speed ?
    (c) What is the ratio of Robert's terminal speeds with and without the canopy ? If Robert falls face-down, we can estimate that his cross sectional area is about 1 m2. In the beginning of the book, Robert learns from a prominent physicist (director of CERN, the particle physics lab in Geneva, Switzerland) that "One square yard of drag reduces one's speed by 20%". How accurate is this number ?
    (d) If Robert reaches the terminal speed falling face-down without the parachute first (i.e. with cross sectional area of 1 m2) and then spreads the canopy to cover 8 m2, what initial drag force would he experience ? Would he be likely to hold on ?




  5. The Great Pyramid of Gizeh (40 points)
    The Great Pyramid (also known as Pyramid of Khufu or Cheops in Greek) at Gizeh, Egypt, when first erected (it has since lost a certain amount of its outermost layer) was about 150 m high and had a square base of edge length 230 m. It is effectively a solid block of stone of density about 2.5 g/cm3.

    (a) What is the minimum amount of work required to assemble the pyramid, if the stone is initially at ground level?
    (b) Assume that a slave employed in the construction of the pyramid had a food intake of about 1500 Cal/day (1 Cal = 4182 Joules). The Greek historian Herodotus reported that the job took 100,000 slaves 20 years. How efficient were the slaves (i.e. what is the ratio of work done toward pyramid-building by energy consumed)?
    (c) The blocks were probably raised to the top of the pyramid along the sides by a system of ropes, perhaps with a pulley located at the top. The average mass of the block in the pyramid is 2.5 tons. Suppose that to raise a block, the slaves place it on a cart which reduces the coefficient of friction between the block and the side of the pyramid to about μ=0.1. Estimate the amount of work needed to raise a single block to the top of the pyramid. If each slave can pull with a force of 500 N (about 110 lbs), how many slaves are needed to raise a single block without any mechanical advantage device (e.g. a block-and-tackle) ?

    Solutions to Problems 4-5




  6. NHL Slapshot (20 points)

    The hockey legend Bobby Hull could shoot the puck at the mind-boggling speed of v=120 mph. The standard hockey puck is a disc of vulcanized rubber, with the regulation weight of 6 oz (m=170 g). Imagine one of Hull's pucks hits a 200-lb (M=90 kg) goaltender and gets absorbed in his chestpad (the collision is fully inelastic).

      (a) If the goaltender is initially at rest and ignoring friction (the goalies used to stand much more on their skates in Hull's days !), what is the speed of the goaltender and the puck after the collision ?
      (b) How much kinetic energy is lost ? This energy presumably has gone into deforming the goalie's gear (and warming it up in the process).
      (c) Suppose the goalie's pad is 10 cm thick, and it's fully compressed by the puck. What average force does the goalie experience ?




  7. Centripetal acceleration on Earth (20 points)

    Since Earth is rotating around its axis, it is not really an inertial frame. That is, every object on the Earth surface experiences centripetal acceleration, which points toward the axis of rotation. At the Equator, the centripetal acceleration, naturally, points directly downward (toward the center of the Earth) and coincides in direction with the gravitational acceleration. In very precise ballistics calculations, we have to take that into account. (In weather predictions, a similar effect, a fictitious Coriolis force, plays a very important role).

    (a) (5 pts) How large is the centripetal acceleration at the Equator, compared to acceleration of free fall g ? Circumference of the Equator is approximately 40,000 km.
    (b) (5 pts) How large is the centripetal acceleration at the North Pole ?
    (c) (10 pts) Now imagine two people: one at the North Pole, and another at the Equator. Each drops a ball from the same height h=1 m. Which ball would be falling longer ?




  8. Gymnast on a Horizontal Bar (25 points)

    A young gymnast is trying to learn a skill called the giants, in which he would make a complete revolution around a Horizontal Bar (an apparatus in men's artistic gymnastics). See animation below.

    To aide the young gymnast, his coach tells him to kick at the bottom of the swing (i.e. increase his angular velocity at the bottom), and to push the bar at the top. Is the coach right ?
    In the following, we will approximate the gymnast as a rigid solid rod, with mass m=40 kg, and length (fingers to toes, with arms stretched up, as in the rotating picture) L=1.5 m. As a reminder, the moment of inertia of the solid rod rotating around its end is I=mL2/3. Ignore friction between the hands and the bar (chalk on the hands reduces that).

    (a) (10 pts) As the gymnast rotates around the bar, his angular velocity is not constant, since the gravity provides torque, and changes the potential energy of his center of mass. Estimate his minimal angular velocity at the bottom of the swing, to barely make it around the top (i.e. so that he has zero angular velocity at the top) ?
    (b) (5 pts) What is the force the gymnast applies to the bar on the top ? Is he pushing himself away from the bar, or pulling toward it ?
    (c) (10 pts) What is the force the gymnast applies to the bar on the bottom ? Is he pushing himself away from the bar, or pulling toward it ?


    Solutions to Problems 6-8




  9. Practice problems for MT2 supplement problems for this week. In particular, check out problems on the rigid body equilibrium (#2b), angular momentum conservation (#3), buoyancy (#4) and Bernoulli's law (#5). Also see solutions.



  10. A couple of oscillators (25 points)

    Here are two (unrelated) examples of unusual oscillators.

    (a) (15 points) Imagine a straight tunnel bored through the center of the Earth from one point on the surface (say, near Berkeley, CA) to the other side (alas, this would be in the Indian Ocean somewhere!). We'll assume that the tunnel is carefully built to withstand large temperatures and pressures in the middle of the Earth, and it is evacuated well enough to ignore air resistance inside the tunnel. If you drop a rock into this tunnel, it will experience a gravity force directed straight toward the center of the Earth. Calculations show that the weight of the rock inside the tunnel depends linearly on the distance r from the center of the Earth: W(r)=mgr/R where m is the mass of the rock, g=9.8 m/s2, and R=6400 km is the radius of the Earth. Prove that the motion of the rock inside the tunnel is periodic, and find the period.

    (b) (10 points) Now imagine a wooden cube, 10x10x10 cm3 in size. The density of wood is 500 kg/m3, so this cube floats in water. Suppose that it floats with one of its faces parallel to the water surface. You push this cube slightly down, to submerge 3/4 of its volume in the water, and then let go. The cube starts oscillating vertically around its equilibrium position. What is the frequency and amplitude of this oscillation ? (Unlike the previous question, you can do this experiment at home !)

    The key to these problems is recognizing that they describe motion of an object under the influence of restoring force. If the force is proportional to displacement from the equilibrium position (like in the spring), and is opposite in sign, the result is the oscillating motion. This can be seen in many physical systems. In fact, oscillations are probably the most common type of motion you will see.

    Solution (courtesy Eunhwa Jeong). Notice that Eunhwa uses a special short-hand notation: x with two dots on top. Don't be thrown off: it is just another symbol for acceleration (or second derivative of position).